Not rendering correctly? View this email as a web page here.
I voted
A volunteer holds a direction sign outside a vote center at Dodger Stadium on Election Day in 2020. Photo by Ringo Chiu/Shutterstock.

These two things can be true at once:

  1. There is no evidence of fraud in California’s elections, as President Trump and Spencer Pratt are insisting.
  2. California could and probably should count ballots faster.

Pratt won’t be on the LA mayoral ballot in November, but Republican Steve Hilton has made it into the runoff for governor against Democrat Xavier Becerra.

Hilton told CNN that “we’ve seen nothing” in terms of fraud.

Yet, U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli is making vague predictions that people will be charged over California’s election process.

This came a day after President Trump walked out of an interview with NBC’s Meet The Press when he couldn’t point to any evidence supporting his claims that Democrats were rigging the LA mayor’s race.

That wasn’t a surprise. Four years ago, Trump hung up the phone on NPR’s Steve Inskeep when presented with facts that shut down his lies about the 2020 election.

While it may be clear that California (and the rest of the country) has a secure voting process, some top voting advocates are calling for changes in our process.

Why are we suddenly in the spotlight?

It’s not just Trump’s disinformation campaign about non-existent fraud. That is nothing new.

It’s that we had incredibly tight and unpredictable races for governor and LA mayor where Republicans seemed to have some rare opportunities, and those dominated the national attention. The other states voting the same day didn’t hold a candle to our drama or the personalities involved.

Never Change!_KCRWxVidiots - Advance Screening Banners - RSVP-600x100

A decade into the Trump era of American politics, everyone is well aware of what happens when opportunities are presented for conspiracy theories to spread. California’s slow count is one of those opportunities.

It can be described in a few different ways.

  • A trade-off: The state increased accessibility by giving everyone a mail-in ballot, meaning a slower process that ensures both security and ample participation. According to the Public Policy Institute of California, the universal mail-in voting option increases voter participation by four percent.
  • A red mirage: Democratic-leaning voters are more likely to cast mail-in ballots and cast them late, meaning the results fairly consistently favor Republicans in the early numbers on election night.
  • Business as usual: California has taken a long time to count votes for as long as I can remember, though it has taken longer since the expansion of mail-in voting during the pandemic.

The slow count isn’t just about mail-in voting deadlines that stretch a week after Election Day. I talked to multiple voters who put their ballots in drop boxes at voting centers before polls closed last Tuesday, avoiding any postal delays, but they didn’t get confirmation until as late as Saturday that their vote had been received.

That’s unsettling as you’re watching a close race with such high stakes.

It’s also a choice.

More funding could go into staffing and other resources to speed up the count. Vote counting centers could be staffed 24/7 instead of stopping late on election night and continuing at daybreak. Updates on results could be provided more than once a day, which puts more attention on each “drop,” a term that does nothing to tamp down conspiracy theories.

We don’t need to count 100% of the votes right away. The ballots that arrive in the mail last aren’t necessarily going to determine the outcome, but the votes that are submitted by Election Day could be counted more quickly to make the outcomes of high-profile races clearer earlier.

This is a test run for November. If Republicans do better than expected in races for Congress, the balance of power could hang on a few districts in California. In 2022, it took eight days to figure out that Republican Mike Garcia won California’s 27th District, giving the GOP a majority.

But the rules that govern California elections could be different by the midterms.

The Supreme Court will soon decide a case that could require all ballots to be received — not just postmarked — by Election Day in all 50 states.

That could reduce participation by California voters.

Based on the voter experiences I heard over the last week, it also may not speed up the count that much.

Never Change!_KCRWxVidiots - Advance Screening Banners - RSVP-600x74

THIS WEEK’S OPEN TABS

🚨NPR Exclusive: ICE says they don’t keep a database of protesters, except it seems they probably do.

📈Former Rep. George Santos threatened an NPR reporter who revealed he’s being investigated for his trading activity on the prediction market Kalshi.

📂The New York Times has a behind-the-scenes look at how the Epstein files have roiled the White House.

Take care,
Arnie

If someone forwarded this to you and you want to subscribe, click here.

Disclaimer: This newsletter, “KCRW's Steady State,” is not affiliated with The Steady State, a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization founded in 2016 and comprised of more than 390 former senior national security professionals. They advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.

Never Change!_KCRWxVidiots - Advance Screening Banners - RSVP-600x74
KCRW exists to help you stay informed without being overwhelmed. Our journalists and creators are always here to connect you to LA, and the world. Support our creators.